Definition needs to be grammatically correct

Vince - (v.) - 1. to be in an utter state of confusion after having a conversation with Vince McNeil. "If you are ever like 'wtf' after Vince has just walked away from you, you've been Vinced!" 

I have never been so sick to my stomach over this absolute stultiloquence

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/09/bradford-wells-anthony-john-makk-deportation_n_922279.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

|

This is downright and absolutely disgusting. Honestly, those who made this decision are heartless. These issues are supposed to be evaluated on case-by-case bases and if this case didn't hit those people's common sense, better judgment, and human decency then those people are the ones who needs to be deported.

Whoever made this decision needs to win a Darwin Award, stat!

I don't want those people procreating children to propagate their sheer idiocy and lack of respect for another human and citizen of this country regardless of their opinions on their lifestyle.

He basically just watched a bus run someone over and didn't warn them because he disagrees with their lifestyle. I feel that that is an equivalent statement to analogize with this story.

I'm all for Obama, but come the hell on. When someone says they "believe" marriage is thisthatandtheother they are not evaluating marriage on the political level that LGBT are trying to obtain. If your faith does not permit gay marriage, then gay people won't get married in your church; however, marriage IS a legal institution as well; therefore, it should be segregated in the minds of religious citizens and politicians when they go to evaluate their opinions. How many times does it have to be said that rights as a citizen have NOTHING TO DO WITH FAITH AND/OR PERSONAL DISTASTE IN LIFESTYLE?

That lesbian couple down the street will not do anything to your household; furthermore, their existence and proximity will allow you to teach your children more thoroughly how to hate if that is how you so choose to indoctrinate your children into becoming closed-minded, disdainful citizens. Your choice; far be it from me to tell you how to raise your children. Take 'em out of the schools and teach them yourselves since you don't want equality and truth being taught in schools. Since you claim to know everything, ban together and create education systems that teach the minuscule subset of history and current events that you want your children to learn so that when they get into the real world, they won't be prepared to handle the vastness of diversity, amiability, and expression that comes at them and they can win Darwin Awards too.

Bottom line: If you don't like gay marriage, don't marry a gay person.

Great Blogs

http://cuteboysatthetechcenter.tumblr.com/

http://fuckyeahtempleuniversity.tumblr.com/

http://tecacreature.tumblr.com/

http://specialed01.tumblr.com/

http://fuckyeah1990s.tumblr.com/

Should children be spanked?

Yes; in order to justify my response, however, I feel that parents should attempt to communicate their frustration (as best they can considering the age of the child) to the child first before going straight to spanking.

Still, there are going to be children who insist on being difficult. Sometimes in certain situations, it is easier to quickly reprimand a child physically in order to teach them the needed lesson most effectively. Children must understand the give and take of the world we live in. (Touching a hot stove will burn you, smacking a dog in the face might get you bitten, crossing the street w/o looking both ways can be fatal.) Sometimes, if an immature or irresponsible child does not have the memory of that previous spanking or doesn't fear an upcoming one, they might commit acts that could be potentially dangerous. It's almost akin to religion and law, in a sense, I feel. If one doesn't believe. If one does not believe in the validity of some form of judge, jury, and punishment, then without an innate code of ethics or common sense, they will go do whatever they dang well please. Which can clearly be dangerous for many people. And we can all agree that children do not come with software included; we basically program them as they grow; therefore, it is important that as we instill our morals and ethics into them that they realize they need to behave in the microcosms of home and school of the world they live in before they grow up and start participating in the world on a grander scale.

In order for a child to grow up and mature into a respectful teenager and young adult, he or she will have to understand that there are consequences for negative behaviors. I feel, that in my experience, the teenagers who I had the most difficulty relating to or dealing with in high school were the ones whose parents did not discipline them properly as a child. There is a golden mean for corrective spanking; moreover, I feel that the line between parenting and abuse is not as thin as the media makes it. I, to this day, respect my mother and fear her spanking me and I'm 20 years old! It clearly depends on the child, but ultimately it depends on the parent and their mental state and levels of stress and parenting situation (single, widowed, married with issues, married, etc)

I always say when I find a teenager who missed out on some crucial life lessons from bad parenting that "it's not my job to teach them that lesson; however, someone in the real world will. They are going to anger the wrong person and then they'll learn." Now the consequences for their actions then, shoot, I bet they wish all they got was a spanking.